Misha and crew have been covering this issue all weekend, and they’ve been doing a stellar job.  Newsbusters
got on this as well.  But I feel I have to let loose with some serious
invective here, because:  a) I’m in a mood, 2) it’s early in the
morning on Labor Day, and for some ungodly reason I’m awake and iii)
because anytime I can vent my spleen while showing the sheer
vindictiveness and twisted sociopathy of the libtards as they try to
find something, ANYTHING, with which to ruin Sarah Palin’s reputation
after McCain announced her as his running mate, I will do so with glee.

I think I’ve
been pretty objective about Palin.  I’ve listed my concerns, and listed
my reasons for liking her as well.  She’s a solid conservative, family
woman, pro-Second Amendment, fiscal conservative, and HAWT, according
to all my male friends.  As I’ve stated before, I’m not thrilled with
the attitude that government should have anything to do with
sanctioning a relationship between two consenting adults, and I’m still
torn on the abortion in cases of rape and incest issue, which she
apparently opposes, and I refuse to turn a victim into an incubator for
her predator’s seed.  But overall, Palin seems pretty solid.

Which,
of course, makes certain repugnant libtards soil their depends in sheer
terror!  So they launched “Operation Destroy Palin” to ruin her
reputation, her honor and her integrity as a woman and as a human
being.  Obviously the thought of an intelligent, successful woman who
just happens to be a conservative makes them seize in fits of
apoplectic, drooling fury!

Apparently, since Palin chose to keep
her youngest, Trig, who was born with Down’s Syndrome, instead of
choosing to toss him onto the trash heap with other medical waste, is
just appaling to the classless, demented demonrat supporters, so they
had to manufacture a sordid tale that Palin really wasn’t pregnant with
Trig.  She was actually covering up for her pregnant teenage daughter,
and pretending that Trig was, in fact, hers! 

“Why?” you ask. 

Where would these pathetic, drooling sacks of malodorous flotsam get this despicable idea?

Apparently
Sarah Palin didn’t LOOK pregnant at seven months!  That’s it.  She
looked good (after all, she’s an athlete who runs marathons and looks
absolutely amazing at 44) and therefore, she HAD to have faked her
pregnancy, because no one can NOT look like a beached whale.  And in
sheer desperation, festering assholes like the Daily Kos, Andrew
Sullivan, and even Alan Colmes, who, despite being a brainless, leftist
dickdrip, was at least a decent human being… until he jumped on the
baseless, twisted “Palin covered up her teenager’s pregnancy” bandwagon.

Oh, and by the way, here‘s a photo of Palin “faking” her supposed pregnancy.

The
lack of class on the part of the libtards is truly appalling.  When
faced with the possibility of a quality candidate on a side they don’t
happen to support, they’ll do anything and everything to destroy the
opponent in the most vile, foul, disgusting manner possible. 

I
may have my concerns about Palin, and I definitely have more than a
little disdain for McCain, but this is beyond the pale!  It shows
desperation, lack of class, lack of couth and a complete disregard for
Palin as a woman and as a human being. 

For a bunch of
asstards who bitch and moan about the glass ceiling, lack of
opportunities for women and the misogyny of Republicans, they are sure
quick to try and ruin Palin’s reputation, integrity and life.  I guess
they’re only concerned about women’s rights when that woman happens to
be a cankled Marxist.

UPDATE THE FIRST:  The classless assholes at Kos have grudgingly admitted that the photo of Sarah Palin I linked to above may actually prove that she was, indeed, pregnant.  But then… maybe not!

Yes, it may be a fake pregnancy suit, but we have no evidence of that,
other than self-serving testimony of Alaska Airlines crew claiming that
they had no idea Palin was pregnant (if they’d had any idea, they
should have kept her off the flight).

A fake pregnancy suit!  You Kostards are really quite the pieces of…. work, aren’t you?  You’re SO fucking pathetically desperate for this story to be true, you’re willing to float the “pregnancy suit” conjecture??  Talk about shitting your panties in fear of one tough little Alaskan!

UPDATE THE SECOND:  The Kostards continue their insane character assassinations as part of Palin Derangement Syndrome (PDS) with this little gem.   Apparently, Sarah Palin is some kind of secessionist, anti-American, anarchist nut.  Keep digging, losers!  The more you struggle to destroy this woman, the more pathetic you look.

UPDATE THE THIRD:  Seems that 17 year old Bristol Palin is really pregnant this time.  She’s going to marry the father and keep the baby.  Her own decision, according to Reuters.  Wonder what the Kostards will come up with next. 

Lemme guess:

  • The pro-life Palin and her husband are forcing the teenager to keep the kid, and won’t let her have an abortion, thereby ruining her young life.
  • What kind of good, Christian mom can Palin be, if her kid gets knocked up at 17?

I guess we’ll see just how repugnant these twisted degenerates can get in the next couple of days.

AND WE’RE OFF!  First in from Kos:  So much for “abstinence only” education.

Maybe one more abstinence-only supporting politicians
will realize the limits of such an approach. Teens will do what they
will do. It’s obvious Bristol would’ve been better served with a
discussion about safe sex. Instead, she’s now facing a shotgun wedding
to the baby’s father.

Shotgun wedding, eh?  Couldn’t possibly be Bristol’s choice, could it?  It, of course, has to be forced upon her by her evil, conservative parents, right?  Now, I’m not a big proponent of “abstinence only” education.  I think it’s unrealistic crap.  However, the question about “abstinence only” education in link to the Eagle Forum questionnaire is, as far as I’m concerned, very extremist in its wording:

3. Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage
education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based
clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?


The question is very either/or.  There’s no alternative, such as maybe teaching kids about safe sex, but also informing them that no contraception is 100 percent effective in preventing pregnancy or STDs.   Faced with an either/or choice, Palin replied, “Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.” 

Educational programs need not be explicit.  They need to be factual and objective.  The schools in my area provide an detailed lesson plan of what the health education program will teach, and it offers parents a choice to opt their children out of the lessons.  Not a problem.  I think it’s a decent substitute for the either/or choice offered by the questionnaire.

I don’t know whether Palin spoke with her children about sex, but as a responsible parent, I would assume so.  I’m fairly sure Bristol knew about contraception, if not from school, then from friends or her parents.  Seriously, do we really think kids today are so sheltered that they can’t get the info if they need it?  Please!  She made a mistake.  Obviously.  That happens.  But she’s also taking responsibility for her actions and making an informed choice.  There’s no evidence that she’s being forced to keep the child or to marry the father. 

But it’s nice to know that the festering asshats at Kos make those assumptions for us, and report them as if they were gospel.

Assholes.