One of the regular commenters on Rachel’s site warned me. I didn’t listen. I went and took a look at yet another whiny, self-righteous, dimwitted female’s site, advocating the kinder, gentler hope and change that Obutthead is promising the world, and I had to throw up in my mouth after reading the mealy-mouthed, sanctimonious, self-entitled bullshit she was spewing! Socialists really have no friggin’ idea what they’re advocating.
Never mind that universal health care has been a proven failure.
Never mind that funding a multi-billion dollar health care fiasco when we’re already running at a deficit is monumentally stupid!
Never mind that creating another gargantuan bureaucracy to control health care is retarded! Since when has more bureaucratic government bullshit solved anything? And since when are government bureaucrats more qualified to make health care decisions than doctors?
Oh, but there are NEEEEEEEEEEEEEDY people out there!
Guess what, you moralistic twat! Their needs do not trump my rights. While I feel bad for families who can’t afford treatment for their children, stealing yet more of my earnings via government force to pay for yet another inefficient, inept government bureaucracy isn’t going to endear these people to me. There is only one difference between sanctimonious politicians stealing my earnings by government force in order to pay for the “common good” and a robber who steals my earnings at the point of a gun and claims he’s going to give it to the “needy” – the former is sanctioned by ignorant, self-righteous numbnuts like you, who think the nanny state is the answer to all your needs.
Yeah, I feel bad that you have a sick kid and you have to pay outrageous insurance rates to keep her healthy. It sucks. And you know what? If I had the means, I’d probably help you out, and so would millions of other kind, charitable Americans, who could have a lot more to give if your government would stay the hell out of their wallets. Unfortunately, Oshithead and crew are such misanthropic assholes that they don’t trust the people to take care of their own willingly. They don’t trust their hearts and their compassion to help out those in need voluntarily. And they are so pompous and arrogant that they think they’re more qualified than you to manage your money. They would rather redistribute it by force than allow you to voluntarily help others. That’s the kind of anti-human, thieving asshole you want to elect to office!
If you’re willing to give up more of your paycheck to help others get adequate healthcare, then fucking do it! But don’t presume to know my financial situation, the extent to which I’m able to help others or even my desire to do it! Maybe I want to be a heartless bitch, but guess what! That’s my goddamn right! I’ve goddamn EARNED it!
It is my right to do with my property and my earnings as I want or see fit. Why? Because I goddamn EARNED it!
I didn’t grow up in a white, middle-class family like you did. My parents came here with $300 in their pockets and no knowledge of English whatsoever. I EARNED a college scholarship, because my parents couldn’t afford to pay for school. I worked two fucking jobs in college just to muddle through. I worked for everything I EARNED, and I don’t appreciate someone who quite obviously was handed everything by her “white, middle class family who could afford to send [her] to college” and doesn’t appreciate the value of her own work telling me how my property needs to be redistributed by those who have no right to appropriate it to those who haven’t earned it.
If you have so little respect for your own hard work and your achievements that you’re willing to allow any bloviating politician to dispose of them as they see fit, that is your right, because it’s YOUR hard work and YOUR earnings. And I have the right to tell these same politicians to go fuck themselves for the same exact reasons. What is it that makes you so entitled to impose your version of morality on me, you presumptuous twit? What is it, exactly, that makes you more qualified to dispose of my earnings?
So take your pious, holier-than-thou platitudes about how you’d give up more of your earnings to help others and shove them up your ass. Neither you, nor Obama are qualified to make that decision for me!
UPDATE: Mark brought up a good suggestion in a comment to this piece, and I will take that suggestion and run with it. I’m posting the Bill of No Rights written by Lewis Napper. Enjoy. And remember – when the productive and hard-working are forced to work for the benefit of the lazy and useless, their property appropriated by corrupt politicians and redistributed to those who haven’t earned it, we call that slavery. I believe they outlawed that in the United States a while back.
We, the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid any more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt-ridden, delusional and other liberal, commie, pinko bedwetters.
We hold these truths to be self-evident: that a whole lot of people were confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim that they require a Bill of No Rights.
ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen color TV or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.
ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone—not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc., but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.
ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful, do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.
ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.
ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we’re just not interested in public health care.
ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim or kill someone, don’t be surprised if the rest of us get together and kill you.
ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don’t be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won’t have the right to a big-screen color TV or a life of leisure.
ARTICLE VIII: You don’t have the right to demand that our children risk their lives in foreign wars to soothe your aching conscience. We hate oppressive governments and won’t lift a finger to stop you from going to fight if you’d like. However, we do not enjoy parenting the entire world and do not want to spend so much of our time battling each and every little tyrant with a military uniform and funny hat.
ARTICLE IX: You don’t have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have one, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities in education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.
ARTICLE X: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to pursue happiness—which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an overabundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.




Sep 10, 2008 @ 04:16:00
It’s one thing for her to offer her money, but quite another for her to offer yours. (It’s called “theft” for any of you morally vacant socialists out there)
Sep 10, 2008 @ 10:39:20
Nicki,Maybe it’s time you repost Mitchell Kaye’s “Bill of No Rights.” While it’s been quite a few years since he first composed it, the sentiment expressed within it are timeless. Well worth resurrecting.
Sep 10, 2008 @ 11:15:07
Mark, you’re absolutely correct. One small detail, though. The Bill of No Rights was not written by Mitchell Kaye, but by Lewis Napper, an amateur philosopher from Mississippi who ran for a U.S. Senate seat as a Libertarian in 2000. I will gladly post it.
Sep 10, 2008 @ 12:54:12
Yep Obama is rich and he ownes my dream plane (the gulf stream jet). Hopefully he is the first socialist to cash out and give his plane to the people who hate us!
Sep 10, 2008 @ 15:53:24
[Sniff .... ahhhhhh.]I do so love the smell of freshly-eviscerated Dooce in the morning. I’m so very glad you went there, and here. It’s what I have come to expect from you, Nicki. Eloquent evisceration.I stole the “Bill of No Rights” and it is winging its way around the intertubz for all to appreciate.
Sep 10, 2008 @ 16:45:07
HEATHER!!!!! I have missed you so so so much!How the hell are you?Dooce… it just reminds me of douche, which reminds me of a stale bag of vinegar and water left laying around after a particularly nasty night at the frat house.Don’t be a stranger, sweetie!
Sep 10, 2008 @ 18:09:29
“Dooce… it just reminds me of douche”I read this “Dooce” website for the first time yesterday and the entire time I was thinking “Douche” and wondering why anyone, especially of the female persuasion, would choose such a name. Maybe subconsciously some people just don’t have a clue how to get out of their own way.I found my way over here from Rachel’s blog. I think I found my second favorite daily blog to visit. Thanks for that!
Sep 10, 2008 @ 18:23:30
Wow! The fact that I’m even in remotely the same class as Rachel is truly an honor. Thank you. I consider Rachel to be one of my closest friends, so I’m definitely humbled by the comparison. I love her like a sister!”Doosh!” that’s how I used to write the word “douche” — kind of like “stoopid.” Same concept. Also it actually looks and sounds like the sound made when a bag of vinegar and a bag of water collide… “DOOSH!”
Sep 10, 2008 @ 23:53:47
Hey Nicki!I am so glad you changed the format — I couldn’t remember my old log-in, and thus couldn’t comment on the old site.I see you’ve been well — been through a long 6 months, hub tried to kill himself on a snowmobile and is finally able to hobble on a cane now.Anyway — expect to see a LOT more of me, chickadee!And you are so right about socialists being clueless … I actually saw a question on a website today asking “what’s so wrong with socialsm? Can anybody explain that to me? I mean it seems like a good idea to take care of everyone in a society equally, right?” I almost commented (or sicced you on it) after I calmed down. Since comments were closed, I didn’t think either of us needed to aggrevate our collective ulcer.
Sep 11, 2008 @ 02:02:52
It’s my Heather!!! YAY!!!!I’m sorry ’bout the hubs and the snowmobile. Damn boys… they’ll do anything for an adrenaline rush! Is he going to be able to run again? You know, I’m convinced that the only people who like socialism or find it somehow chic instead of what it really is – an anti-human, callous death cult – are the ones who grew up without want, without lacking anything. They really just don’t get it.I’m SO glad you’re back around!
Sep 11, 2008 @ 13:59:40
Nickigreat site. I’ve been checking it out occasionally and will return more often.I enjoyed your bill of rights and concur wholeheartedly. Good luck with this venture and see you around.D’
Sep 11, 2008 @ 16:35:13
Hey Nicki!I am so glad you changed the format — I couldn’t remember my old log-in, and thus couldn’t comment on the old site.I see you’ve been well — been through a long 6 months, hub tried to kill himself on a snowmobile and is finally able to hobble on a cane now.Anyway — expect to see a LOT more of me, chickadee!And you are so right about socialists being clueless … I actually saw a question on a website today asking “what’s so wrong with socialsm? Can anybody explain that to me? I mean it seems like a good idea to take care of everyone in a society equally, right?” I almost commented (or sicced you on it) after I calmed down. Since comments were closed, I didn’t think either of us needed to aggrevate our collective ulcer.
Sep 11, 2008 @ 16:55:20
Hey, Heather – wanna hear something weird? Your comments keep coming in as “spam.” I approved one yesterday and replied. All of a sudden the same one appeared and came up as “spam” just now in the moderation filter, and wouldn’t let me change it! WTF???Damn computer gremlins!
Oct 23, 2008 @ 19:59:40
<a href="hmpivest“>http://nbedfjba.com“>hmpivest [URL=http://rwxzyyat.comtmfbjpgk/URL] iqyonvmo http://ibnfhzut.com mvecyahq aljtezrr