I just got off the phone with my Sgt. Major. Yes, I’m out of the military, but SGM Siebold will ALWAYS be my Sgt. Major! Always. This is a man who has been an exemplary Soldier, a good friend, an outstanding leader, a strong mentor, an impartial audience and a valued advisor. When I first joined the Virginia Army National Guard after a six-year break from active duty, SGM Siebold quickly became a guide and a strong voice of reason in my military career and my life.
He inspired me. He advised me – without politically correct nonsense, without bias and always keeping my best interest at heart. He allowed me to make my own decisions and mistakes, without condescension and without self-righteousness. He recognized my intelligence and my maturity and allowed me to come to my own conclusions. If I asked for advice, he gave it. If I came into his office angry and upset, he’d help put things in perspective. If I had problems related to my job, or my military service, he’d advise, point me in the right direction and square me away. Oh… and if I was acting like an asshat, which I seem to remember was quite often, he’d give me a figurative slap upside the head to set me straight.
That’s the mark of a truly superior NCO. His door is always open, and his Soldiers come first. He takes care of his troops, first and foremost, and will go to the mat for what is right every single time.
Of course, any senior NCO I idolize as much as SGM Siebold will have one major thing in common with me: a complete lack of political correctness. I can’t remember how many times I’ve heard him say, “It is what it is,” and that’s the way he deals with people – realistically, without coddling, without bullshit. That is not to say that he’s tactless. Not at all. He’s calm and respectful, but invariably straightforward. That is how senior NCOs should be, in my humble opinion. They’re the ones who shape the Army’s future leaders. They’re the ones who lead the way, despite the politics and other associated crap.
SGM Siebold has been there, and done that. He does his job, he does it well, with dignity and without fanfare. He doesn’t show off. He just does his job, and does it better than anyone else. He’s fair, he’s knowledgeable, and he has the experience to back up that knowledge. He is what Soldiers strive to be, and what NCOs work to emulate.
So one would think that if there’s any Soldier who is best suited to take the reins of the 29th Division, it would be SGM Siebold, right? RIGHT???
Apparently not.
And that’s been the one thing that has consistently disappointed me about the National Guard since I joined. I’ve seen all manner of asshats get promoted to their level of incompetence. Quite literally…. SGM knows how many times the words “THEY PROMOTED HIM/HER TO *INSERT RANK HERE*?????” has come out of my mouth in the four years we’ve known one another. I’ve seen quality NCOs get denied promotions because of bureaucratic bullshit. Hell, I couldn’t get promoted to Staff Sgt., because even though I was at the top of the promotion list with the most points in the state, apparently there was only ONE slot in the entire state of Virginia for my Military Occupational Specialty (MOS), and it was occupied by someone who wasn’t even MOS qualified yet! I’ve seen quality NCOs get denied a promotion because there were “no slots” in their career field. But when you get to the SGM level, a lot of it is politics.
And that’s what pisses me off about the current situation. SGM Siebold applied for the Command Sergeant Major position with the 29th. By all rights, he should have gotten it. He’s qualified, respected, experienced and wise. But because someone’s widdle feewings got needled, due to the application not having passed through his esteemed office, a few phonecalls were made, and the man whom I consider to be one of the best Sergeants Major in the military was rejected. Just like that. Someone above him didn’t feel he got the respect for his authoritah! that he deserved, and the 29th lost what could have been one of the best leaders it could ever hope to have!
Worse yet, in the true tradition of a coward, this act of betrayal to the Army National Guard, to the 29th and to an absolutely stellar NCO, was performed without any effort to get to know the Soldier, to learn about his experience, to learn about his knowledge and his leadership ability – under the guise of “Well, you didn’t have the experience… you’re not suited for the position… you’re, blah blah blah…”
Those of us who know SGM Siebold and who have worked for and with him, know that is complete and utter bullshit. Knowing the elements of psychology, and being familiar with personality types, my assessment is that someone wasn’t pleased about a) not being consulted about the application, and b) not having had a say in it, and decided that if he couldn’t have his grubby little paws involved, then he would simply submarine the application. I’ve seen too many senior NCOs in the military with this type of superiority complex. They take themselves so seriously, and consider themselves so important, that anything they perceive as a slight to their oh-so-important persona, requires immediate retaliation. In this case, “Oh, you didn’t consider me important enough to run your application through my office? I’ll make sure your application never gets there! All it takes is one phonecall, peon!” And while I don’t know if this was, indeed, the thought process, it sure appears to be right on the money.
Petty little tyrants wielding their petty little power, as if the promotion of a quality NCO to a higher position is somehow a threat to their fragile egos. They’re subconsciously insecure in their own worth, so much so, that the presence of actual quality threatens them. Therefore, they must assert their authority just to make themselves feel better.
These are not the types of leaders we need in the Army. Unfortunately, the SGM Siebold type of leaders are becoming fewer and further between, and the senior NCOs we wind up with leave a lot to be desired. The 29th lost a great leader thanks to the petty machinations of one insecure jerk. I hope they know that.
The problem with the Guard
October 1, 2008




Oct 01, 2008 @ 17:08:24
Nicki, Thank you for the kind words and the vote of confidence. I always thought you were one of the most professional NCOs I dealt with during our trip to Kosovo. It was an honor serving with you and it is an honor to call you a friend.
Oct 01, 2008 @ 18:12:13
Nicki,You have distilled down to the very essence of why I left the Navy. Promotions were based on politics, not aptitude or competence.
Oct 01, 2008 @ 19:47:27
“the presence of actual quality threatens them.”Was really all you needed to say. Been there, done that, got the t-shirt, and have seen more quality personnel short shrifted far more often than not. They all make the same mistake (not my personal opinion), they believe results and success speak for them.As a man I used to work with once said, “Thirty minutes of kissing ass is better than four years of college.” He should know, he was one of the best ass-kissers I ever saw. Totally incompetent in his position, but continuously upwardly mobile. Just so you don’t think this is sour grapes, nothing he ever did or position he ever attained affected me in the least, just telling it the way it is.
Oct 01, 2008 @ 19:52:59
BTW, SGM Siebold, thank you for your service. If Nicki says you “take care of your people” then you take care of your people. There is no finer accolade for a military man or woman.
Oct 01, 2008 @ 20:06:17
Your SGM sounds like my old SGM, which is what ANY NCO should be: honest, honorable, competent, hardworking, inspiring. Let’s hope that whoever becomes the CSM for your old division is cut from that same bolt of cloth.However, I’m with you and Vic about politics in the military. It’s pretty discouraging.
Oct 02, 2008 @ 02:31:42
straightarrow, Thanks, and I agree. The most cherished thing I brought home from my last deployment is a frame that the Enlisted Soldiers of the G3 gave me along with thier support dedication and hard work.
Oct 02, 2008 @ 02:32:13
From what you have described of the great Sergeant Major, it will roll off his back that he didn’t get that position, and if he is a good as you say (and I do believe you) he will always be happier taking care of soldiers than taking care of politicians. And from where I was when and wish I were now, taking care of soldiers going into danger is always the best blest mission an NCO can have.
Oct 02, 2008 @ 03:30:28
I was NCOIC of a section and we got a new Captain. She was doing the new guy tour of the section and was asking us senior NCOs to give a quick description of what we do daily. When she asked me what I did I replied “Shit Umbrella”.She said, “OK, what’s a Shit Umbrella do?”I said that whenever someone up the chain comes up with some stupid policy, a shit detail comes down, or other stupid shit arises that I do my best to keep it from splashing on my people so they can do their jobs.(A bit of background for you non-military types, there’s an old saying we used a lot in the AF that “Shit rolls down hill”.)Needless to say I wasn’t a very politically correct individual (still am not).Anyhoo, my point is that many of the best NCOs (not that I was one of the best) will never achieve the recognition they deserve because they won’t play the political games. They take care of their people and by doing so they can generate quite a bit of ire higher in their chain of command.The greatest feeling I ever had as a supervisor wasn’t when my boss told me I was doing a good job, it was when some the people working for me told me I was the best boss they’d ever worked for–that I cut through the crap so they could do what needed to be done.Nicki, from what you wrote I assume your Sgt. Major has somewhat the same temperament, which is good for him and his people but is probably not so good for his chances at a very political job–Command Sergeant Major.I wish him luck. I’d like to see more people with such attitudes filling positions like Command Sergeant Major and First Sergeant.
Oct 02, 2008 @ 11:55:00
I won’t speak for the SGM, but I’m fairly sure he’s not in it for the recognition or any kind of glory. He is the type of person who wants to make a difference in the lives of his Soldiers, and won’t stop trying to do so. You’re right. He’s not political, and he’ll be the first one to admit it.I would just love to see the Army put politics aside just once, and put the best man for the job in the slot where he can make the biggest difference in the lives of the troops.
Oct 02, 2008 @ 11:57:14
*sniff*I meant every word, and you know that. And thank you for everything (especially helping me keep my temper in check when it came to a certain bald-headed moron, which most certainly helped keep me out of prison!)
Dec 23, 2010 @ 15:18:31
I shall have to respectfully disagree with the comments by Nicki regarding the SGM. The National Guard has come a long way, and is a far more professional organization than you imply. It is unfair and and underhanded to characterize it as such. I too am a veteran with many many years both active and in the Guard. I know of what I speak. First I would ask you: How do you KNOW that the aforementioned SGM was turned down because someone’s feelings were hurt? And more importantly WHY do you know this? Certainly the command would not broadcast it, I suspect neither would the leadership soooo…. that leaves either one of the principles was discussing this with you or someone else in the inner circle. Hardly professional and I’m sorry but it makes your view suspect at the very least. I know many, many fine, hardworking men and women leaders in the Guard who would be highly uncomfortable with a former soldier writing such drivel about them, let alone publishing it. Again, this makes your point of view a little suspect. I have deployed and worked with senior leaders both in the Guard and the Active Army and in every single instance they were honest, careful leaders who would never choose someone for such a flimsy reason. I submit to you that you have done them a disservice. Maybe there were real reasons that the SGM did not get selected, maybe he was just as good as the other person but they had some reason to hire the other person, ONLY the selector knows. To me this sounds like sour grapes by proxy. Hopefully we all learn something from it. AnoldSoldier
Dec 23, 2010 @ 15:47:29
Ms Nicki, as I read this story I am apalled. Since you appear to know the reasoning behind the non-selection of the SGM I have to say your article is suspect at best. I can only surmise where that information came from. I wonder how do you know that? Is it that it comes from one of the two principles involved. If so, one of them would be highly unprofessional to discuss it with you, particularly if they think you would write about it. I served many years in the Army and the National Guard, I served with many a professional senior leader both deployed and at home and never, ever, not once, did anyone ever pass by a good NCO because someone’s feelings might get hurt. IN fact, you do the Officers and leaders of the National Guard a disservice by suggesting it. Most professional senior leaders would be mortified by this article. Besides gratuitious, it comes of as if you are far more close to the SGM than you let on. IT appears to me that this article is nothing more than sour grapes by proxy.
Dec 23, 2010 @ 16:05:22
And I shall respectfully tell you that you’re absolutely free to view my post as suspect or even accuse me of sour grapes. Entirely your choice. I can only relay what I saw and what I was exposed to after serving on active duty and then the National Guard.
Have a nice day.
BTW – you are aware this post is more than 2 years old, right?
Dec 23, 2010 @ 16:52:04
I was not aware and the second post was an abbreviated version of the first as I thought the first did not go through. Feel free to delete at your leisure. My point was: That you could NOT have saw this particular situation unless you were either the selector, selectee or either of their confidantes and that makes the post suspicious. Be that as it may I enjoy many of your other posts, you write with gusto and I like strong opinions. Keep up the good work.
Dec 23, 2010 @ 17:45:17
I don’t think it really matters how I came by the information. I’m not a reporter, and I have no obligation to objectivity, even though I try to be objective in my writing as a general rule. I’ve seen similar shenanigans in the Guard that I have no reason to doubt the story, and it made me angry, so I asked if I could blog about it. Some of the readers who commented encountered similar issues. The military is a microcosm of the civilian world. We can’t pretend these things don’t happen. We can only be grateful when they don’t happen to us.
Cheers!
Dec 23, 2010 @ 17:46:29
BTW – I deleted the first post to avoid duplication.