I certainly hope so!

The Supreme Court will consider two new cases on the scope of
individuals’ Second Amendment right to have guns at its first
Conference for the new Term, on Sept. 29, according to the Court’s
electronic docket.  Both petitions challenge a Seventh Circuit Court
ruling that the Amendment does not restrict gun control laws adopted by
state, county or city government, but applies only to federal laws. 
The cases are National Rifle Association v. Chicago (08-1497) and McDonald v. Chicago (08-1521).

The newest SCOTUS Justice, the “Wise” Latina has previously ruled that the Second Amendment does not apply to states.  So does that mean that the rest of the Bill of Rights doesn’t either?  Does that mean that prayer may be instituted in public schools as long as they don’t receive federal money?  Does that mean that states can impose a state religion on residents?  Can states limit free speech, hamper a free press?  Can state governments control what is printed in newspapers?  The Supreme Court has repeatedly interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates most portions of the Bill of Rights.

The question of the Second Amendment is still open.  Most of the Bill of Rights has been incorporated to apply to the states. 

My question is: why shouldn’t it apply to the states?  Why not a uniform application?  Why should some enumerated rights be protected, while others not?