Just what kind of judge would consciously subvert the United States Constitution – a document he is sworn to uphold?

This kind.

The kind who claims…


…that the District’s handgun registration process, which
requires owners to submit fingerprints and allow police to perform
ballistics tests, is constitutional. He also upheld a city ban on most
semiautomatic pistols…

The city requires that legally
registered revolvers be kept unloaded and either disassembled or secured
with trigger locks, unless the owner reasonably fears immediate harm
by an intruder in the home.

I’d like to know how this repugnant piece of tyrannical trash wound up on a federal bench.  How he can, with a straight face, claim that banning the most commonly sold and owned pistols is not an infringement on anyone’s right to keep and bear arms.

And I’d like to know why he’s not sitting on a bench in some tyrannical third-world shithole, upholding the authority of dictators over their people.

How does the most free nation in the world have a creature such as this serving in a judicial capacity?

Let’s hope Mr. Heller appeals all the way back to the Supreme Court, and let’s hope the Supreme Court has the balls to slap down this petty little tyrant’s appalling, subversive ruling!