Blind, thoughtless, stubborn and ignorant. That’s how I would describe Ron Paul’s latest debate performance. And apparently I’m not the only one who was utterly disgusted by the Congressman’s complete lack of sense and rational thought. Not only does he not have a clue about foreign policy, but he lacks a fundamental human decency in his attempt to be “objective.”

The Fox News/Wall Street Journal debate pile-on began after Paul answered a question about whether the U.S. government had the authority to kill Osama bin Laden. Booed by the boisterous audience, Paul compared bin Laden’s capture in Pakistan to a Chinese dissident hiding in the U.S. and said the U.S. government wouldn’t want China to “bomb us and do whatever.”

In China, the “four big rights” – that guarantee freedoms of speech, dissent and expression – were eliminated. Those who speak out against China’s tyrannical regime are heroes. Chinese dissidents stand up to the authoritarianism that oppresses the people, and have been jailed for years for their courage.

Ron Paul had the unmitigated gall to compare Chinese dissidents seeking help and asylum in the United States to a mass murderer being hidden by an alleged “ally” that receives billions of dollars in American aid!

He was ignorant enough to voice an analogy that is morally repugnant as well as inappropriate.

Dissidents are not terrorists.

Bin Ladin killed thousands of innocent people. To compare that murdering bastard to people who speak out against a tyrannical government is foul.

Yet another reason why I want Ron Paul nowhere near the White House. He’s great on fiscal issues, but completely unfit to be Commander-in-Chief.